.png/:/rs=h:288,cg:true,m/qt=q:95)
Advertising Policy Statement
Purpose and Scope
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the acceptance and presentation of advertisements in Therapeutic Sciences: Emerging Research in Medical Gasses and Regenerative Biology – The International Hyperbarics Association Journal. This policy applies to all print and digital editions of the journal.
Acceptance of Advertisements
Advertisements are subject to approval by the publisher of the journal. The acceptance of advertisement does not imply endorsement by the journal or its publisher. The journal reserves the right to reject any advertisement that does not align with its mission, values, or editorial policies.
Content and Format
Advertisements must be accurate, truthful, and comply with all relevant laws and regulations. Advertisements must not be misleading, deceptive, or offensive. They should not promote any illegal or unethical products, services, or practices. Advertisements should be clearly distinguishable from editorial content. Advertising content must be clearly marked as such.
Conflicts of Interest
The journal maintains a strict separation between editorial and advertising content to avoid any potential conflicts of interest. Editorial decisions are not influenced by advertising revenue or relationships with advertisers.
Target Audience
Advertisements must be appropriate for the journal’s readership, which includes healthcare professionals, researchers, business owners, and consumers at large.
Privacy and Data Protection
Advertisers must comply with applicable data protection and privacy laws. The journal does not share personal information about its readers with advertisers without explicit consent.
Ethical Standards
The journal adheres to high ethical standards in advertising. Advertisements for products related to healthcare and medical treatments must be back by scientific evidence and be approved by relevant regulatory authorities. Medical products must have FDA approval (clearance) to be advertised within the journal and the advertiser must provide a copy of all relevant paperwork for the journal to keep on-file to show that the product has met the requirements for safety, efficacy and quality at the time of publication.
Changes and Amendments
The journal reserves the right to change or amend this policy at any time. Advertisers will be notified of any significant changes that may affect their advertisements.
Contact Information
For specific inquiries about advertising, please contact the journal.
Acceptance, Rejection or Revision of Manuscripts
Additional Information
Acceptance Criteria
- Originality and Novelty: The research presents new and original findings that contribute significantly to the field.
- Scientific Rigor and Validity: The study is methodologically sound, and the conclusions are supported by the data.
- Clarity and Quality of Writing: The manuscript is well-written, clear, and logically structured.
- Relevance: The topic is relevant to the journal’s scope and audience.
- Ethical Standards: The research adheres to ethical guidelines, including proper treatment of human or animal subjects.
- Comprehensive Review of Literature: The manuscript includes a thorough and up-to-date review of the relevant literature.
- Statistical Analysis: Appropriate and rigorous statistical analyses have been conducted.
- Replicability: The study provides enough detail for others to replicate the research.
- Significance of Results: The findings have a significant impact on the field and advance understanding or knowledge.
Rejection Criteria
- Lack of Novelty: The research does not offer new insights or findings.
- Poor Methodology: The study design is flawed, or the methods are not appropriate or well-executed.
- Inadequate Data: The data is insufficient or does not support the conclusions drawn.
- Ethical Concerns: There are ethical issues or violations in the research.
- Out of Scope: The topic is not relevant to the journal’s focus or audience.
- Insufficient Literature Review: The manuscript fails to adequately review relevant prior research.
- Statistical Weakness: Statistical analyses are inappropriate, incorrect or poorly executed.
- Lack of Clarity: The manuscript is poorly written, unclear or disorganized.
- Reproducibility Issues: The study lacks sufficient detail to allow replication.
- Insignificant Results: The findings do not make a substantial contribution to the field.
Revision Criteria
- Minor Revisions: Small changes needed, such as clarifications, additional references or minor mythological adjustments.
- Major Revisions: Significant changes required, such as substantial rewriting, additional experiments, or major methodological improvements.
- Addressing Reviewer Comments: Authors must address specific concerns and suggestions raised by reviewers
- Improving Statistical Analysis: Authors may need to reanalyze data or provide additional statistical information.
- Ethical Clarifications: Authors may need to provide additional details on ethical approvals or procedures.
- Enhancing Clarity and Quality: Authors may need to improve the clarity, organization, and overall quality of writing.
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.